↓ Skip to main content

Toward a Molecular Classification of Colorectal Cancer: The Role of BRAF

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward a Molecular Classification of Colorectal Cancer: The Role of BRAF
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2013.00281
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Thiel, Ari Ristimäki

Abstract

Different genetic aberrations of BRAF have been reported in various malignancies. BRAF is member of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and constitutive activity of this pathway can lead to increased cellular growth, invasion, and metastasis. The most common activating BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer is the V600E mutation, which is present in 5-15% of all tumors, and up to 80% of tumors with high microsatellite instability (MSI) harbor this mutation. BRAF mutation is associated with proximal location, higher age, female gender, MSI-H, high grade, and mucinous histology, and is a marker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. The role of BRAF mutation as a predictive marker in respect of EGFR targeted treatments is controversial. BRAF V600 selective inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of V600 mutation positive metastatic melanoma, but the response rates in colorectal cancer are poor. This might be due to innate resistance mechanisms of colorectal cancers against the treatment solely targeting BRAF. To overcome resistance the combination of treatments, simultaneous inhibition of BRAF and MEK or PI3K/mTOR, might emerge as a successful therapeutic concept.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Other 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 14 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#3,593
of 22,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,596
of 289,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#75
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.