↓ Skip to main content

Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
393 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
511 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2013.00292
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle L. Boland, Aparajita H. Chourasia, Kay F. Macleod

Abstract

A mechanistic understanding of how mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to cell growth and tumorigenesis is emerging beyond Warburg as an area of research that is under-explored in terms of its significance for clinical management of cancer. Work discussed in this review focuses less on the Warburg effect and more on mitochondria and how dysfunctional mitochondria modulate cell cycle, gene expression, metabolism, cell viability, and other established aspects of cell growth and stress responses. There is increasing evidence that key oncogenes and tumor suppressors modulate mitochondrial dynamics through important signaling pathways and that mitochondrial mass and function vary between tumors and individuals but the significance of these events for cancer are not fully appreciated. We explore the interplay between key molecules involved in mitochondrial fission and fusion and in apoptosis, as well as in mitophagy, biogenesis, and spatial dynamics of mitochondria and consider how these distinct mechanisms are coordinated in response to physiological stresses such as hypoxia and nutrient deprivation. Importantly, we examine how deregulation of these processes in cancer has knock on effects for cell proliferation and growth. We define major forms of mitochondrial dysfunction and address the extent to which the functional consequences of such dysfunction can be determined and exploited for cancer diagnosis and treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 486 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 131 26%
Researcher 70 14%
Student > Master 56 11%
Student > Bachelor 55 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 7%
Other 77 15%
Unknown 86 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 156 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 120 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 10%
Chemistry 16 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 3%
Other 52 10%
Unknown 103 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2023.
All research outputs
#505,358
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#81
of 22,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,539
of 289,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#2
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.