↓ Skip to main content

The Potential and Hurdles of Targeted Alpha Therapy – Clinical Trials and Beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Potential and Hurdles of Targeted Alpha Therapy – Clinical Trials and Beyond
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2013.00324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jörgen Elgqvist, Sofia Frost, Jean-Pierre Pouget, Per Albertsson

Abstract

This article presents a general discussion on what has been achieved so far and on the possible future developments of targeted alpha (α)-particle therapy (TAT). Clinical applications and potential benefits of TAT are addressed as well as the drawbacks, such as the limited availability of relevant radionuclides. Alpha-particles have a particular advantage in targeted therapy because of their high potency and specificity. These features are due to their densely ionizing track structure and short path length. The most important consequence, and the major difference compared with the more widely used β(-)-particle emitters, is that single targeted cancer cells can be killed by self-irradiation with α-particles. Several clinical trials on TAT have been reported, completed, or are on-going: four using (213)Bi, two with (211)At, two with (225)Ac, and one with (212)Pb/(212)Bi. Important and conceptual proof-of-principle of the therapeutic advantages of α-particle therapy has come from clinical studies with (223)Ra-dichloride therapy, showing clear benefits in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 193 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 19%
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Other 15 8%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 37 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 40 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 15%
Physics and Astronomy 27 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 44 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2017.
All research outputs
#5,264,716
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,819
of 22,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,870
of 319,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#6
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,544 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.