↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Adult and Pediatric Gliomas: Toward Personalized Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Adult and Pediatric Gliomas: Toward Personalized Treatment
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2014.00047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harry R. Haynes, Sandra Camelo-Piragua, Kathreena M. Kurian

Abstract

It is increasingly clear that both adult and pediatric glial tumor entities represent collections of neoplastic lesions, each with individual pathological molecular events and treatment responses. In this review, we discuss the current prognostic biomarkers validated for clinical use or with future clinical validity for gliomas. Accurate prognostication is crucial for managing patients as treatments may be associated with high morbidity and the benefits of high risk interventions must be judged by the treating clinicians. We also review biomarkers with predictive validity, which may become clinically relevant with the development of targeted therapies for adult and pediatric gliomas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Ukraine 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Other 7 9%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,632
of 22,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,313
of 236,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#22
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.