↓ Skip to main content

Notching on Cancer’s Door: Notch Signaling in Brain Tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Notching on Cancer’s Door: Notch Signaling in Brain Tumors
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2014.00341
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcin Teodorczyk, Mirko H. H. Schmidt

Abstract

Notch receptors play an essential role in the regulation of central cellular processes during embryonic and postnatal development. The mammalian genome encodes for four Notch paralogs (Notch 1-4), which are activated by three Delta-like (Dll1/3/4) and two Serrate-like (Jagged1/2) ligands. Further, non-canonical Notch ligands such as epidermal growth factor like protein 7 (EGFL7) have been identified and serve mostly as antagonists of Notch signaling. The Notch pathway prevents neuronal differentiation in the central nervous system by driving neural stem cell maintenance and commitment of neural progenitor cells into the glial lineage. Notch is therefore often implicated in the development of brain tumors, as tumor cells share various characteristics with neural stem and progenitor cells. Notch receptors are overexpressed in gliomas and their oncogenicity has been confirmed by gain- and loss-of-function studies in vitro and in vivo. To this end, special attention is paid to the impact of Notch signaling on stem-like brain tumor-propagating cells as these cells contribute to growth, survival, invasion, and recurrence of brain tumors. Based on the outcome of ongoing studies in vivo, Notch-directed therapies such as γ-secretase inhibitors and blocking antibodies have entered and completed various clinical trials. This review summarizes the current knowledge on Notch signaling in brain tumor formation and therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 32 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,015,146
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#9,368
of 22,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,442
of 359,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#63
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,544 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.