↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing the Detection of Venous Invasion in Colorectal Cancer: The Ontario, Canada, Experience and Beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimizing the Detection of Venous Invasion in Colorectal Cancer: The Ontario, Canada, Experience and Beyond
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2014.00354
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather Dawson, Richard Kirsch, David K. Driman, David E. Messenger, Naziheh Assarzadegan, Robert H. Riddell

Abstract

Venous invasion (VI) is a well-established independent prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer (CRC). Its accurate detection is particularly important in stage II CRC as it may influence the decision to administer adjuvant therapy. The Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) of the United Kingdom state that VI should be detected in at least 30% of CRC resection specimens. However, our experience in Ontario, Canada suggests that this (conservative) benchmark is rarely met. This article highlights the "Ontario experience" with respect to VI reporting and the key role that careful morphologic assessment, elastin staining and knowledge transfer has played in improving VI detection provincially and beyond.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Other 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,419,456
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,091
of 22,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,403
of 358,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#18
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.