↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Radiotherapy Capacity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Systematic Review of Radiotherapy Capacity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2014.00380
Pubmed ID
Authors

Surbhi Grover, Melody J. Xu, Alyssa Yeager, Lori Rosman, Reinou S. Groen, Smita Chackungal, Danielle Rodin, Margaret Mangaali, Sommer Nurkic, Annemarie Fernandes, Lilie L. Lin, Gillian Thomas, Ana I. Tergas

Abstract

The cancer burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is substantial. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe country and region-specific patterns of radiotherapy (RT) facilities in LMIC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 129 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Lecturer 11 8%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 35 27%
Unknown 37 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Physics and Astronomy 7 5%
Engineering 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 45 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#5,379,073
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,903
of 22,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,280
of 359,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#17
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.