You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Implications of Circulating Tumor Cells of Breast Cancer Patients: Role of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Plasticity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2015.00042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda M. McInnes, Natalie Jacobson, Andrew Redfern, Anthony Dowling, Erik W. Thompson, Christobel M. Saunders |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 24% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2015.
All research outputs
#1,872,124
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#382
of 22,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,078
of 270,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#5
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.