You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Importance of Being Dead: Cell Death Mechanisms Assessment in Anti-Sarcoma Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2015.00082 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Santiago Rello-Varona, David Herrero-Martín, Laura Lagares-Tena, Roser López-Alemany, Núria Mulet-Margalef, Juan Huertas-Martínez, Silvia Garcia-Monclús, Xavier García del Muro, Cristina Muñoz-Pinedo, Oscar Martínez Tirado |
| Abstract |
Cell death can occur through different mechanisms, defined by their nature and physiological implications. Correct assessment of cell death is crucial for cancer therapy success. Sarcomas are a large and diverse group of neoplasias from mesenchymal origin. Among cell death types, apoptosis is by far the most studied in sarcomas. Albeit very promising in other fields, regulated necrosis and other cell death circumstances (as so-called "autophagic cell death" or "mitotic catastrophe") have not been yet properly addressed in sarcomas. Cell death is usually quantified in sarcomas by unspecific assays and in most cases the precise sequence of events remains poorly characterized. In this review, our main objective is to put into context the most recent sarcoma cell death findings in the more general landscape of different cell death modalities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Spain | 3 | 23% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#4,598,258
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,541
of 22,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,501
of 280,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#7
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.