↓ Skip to main content

Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Prostate Cancer: A Mechanism of Radioresistance and Treatment Failure

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Prostate Cancer: A Mechanism of Radioresistance and Treatment Failure
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2015.00090
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chang-Deng Hu, Richard Choo, Jiaoti Huang

Abstract

Neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) in prostate cancer is a well-recognized phenotypic change by which prostate cancer cells transdifferentiate into neuroendocrine-like (NE-like) cells. NE-like cells lack the expression of androgen receptor and prostate specific antigen, and are resistant to treatments. In addition, NE-like cells secrete peptide hormones and growth factors to support the growth of surrounding tumor cells in a paracrine manner. Accumulated evidence has suggested that NED is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis. The importance of NED in prostate cancer progression and therapeutic response is further supported by the fact that therapeutic agents, including androgen-deprivation therapy, chemotherapeutic agents, and radiotherapy, also induce NED. We will review the work supporting the overall hypothesis that therapy-induced NED is a mechanism of resistance to treatments, as well as discuss the relationship between therapy-induced NED and therapy-induced senescence, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and cancer stem cells. Furthermore, we will use radiation-induced NED as a model to explore several NED-based targeting strategies for development of novel therapeutics. Finally, we propose future studies that will specifically address therapy-induced NED in the hope that a better treatment regimen for prostate cancer can be developed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 152 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Master 20 13%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 41 26%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 29 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2015.
All research outputs
#16,063,069
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,651
of 22,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,288
of 279,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#22
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.