↓ Skip to main content

Hsp90, the Concertmaster: Tuning Transcription

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hsp90, the Concertmaster: Tuning Transcription
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2015.00100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nidhi Khurana, Sunanda Bhattacharyya

Abstract

In the last decade, Hsp90 has emerged as a major regulator of cancer cell growth and proliferation. In cancer cells, it assists in giving maturation to oncogenic proteins including several kinases and transcription factors (TF). Recent studies have shown that apart from its chaperone activity, it also imparts regulation of transcription machinery and thereby alters the cellular physiology. Hsp90 and its co-chaperones modulate transcription at least at three different levels. In the first place, they alter the steady-state levels of certain TFs in response to various physiological cues. Second, they modulate the activity of certain epigenetic modifiers, such as histone deacetylases or DNA methyl transferases, and thereby respond to the change in the environment. Third, they participate in the eviction of histones from the promoter region of certain genes and thereby turn on gene expression. In this review, we discuss the role of Hsp90 in all the three aforementioned mechanisms of transcriptional control, taking examples from various model organisms with a special emphasis on cancer progression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2015.
All research outputs
#15,518,326
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#4,856
of 22,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,125
of 279,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#21
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.