↓ Skip to main content

Mutant p53: Multiple Mechanisms Define Biologic Activity in Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutant p53: Multiple Mechanisms Define Biologic Activity in Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2015.00249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Paul Kim, Yun Zhang, Guillermina Lozano

Abstract

The functional importance of p53 as a tumor suppressor gene is evident through its pervasiveness in cancer biology. The p53 gene is the most commonly altered gene in human cancer; however, not all genetic alterations are biologically equivalent. The majority of alterations involve p53 missense mutations that result in the production of mutant p53 proteins. Such mutant p53 proteins lack normal p53 function and may concomitantly gain novel functions, often with deleterious effects. Here, we review characterized mechanisms of mutant p53 gain of function in various model systems. In addition, we review mutant p53 addiction as emerging evidence suggests that tumors may depend on sustained mutant p53 activity for continued growth. We also discuss the role of p53 in stromal elements and their contribution to tumor initiation and progression. Lastly, current genetic mouse models of mutant p53 in various organ systems are reviewed and their limitations discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 111 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 21%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 27 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Chemistry 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 32 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,324
of 22,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,559
of 293,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#57
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.