↓ Skip to main content

The Relevance of Gynecologic Oncologists to Provide High-Quality of Care to Women with Gynecological Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Relevance of Gynecologic Oncologists to Provide High-Quality of Care to Women with Gynecological Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2015.00308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas Minig, Pablo Padilla-Iserte, Cristina Zorrero

Abstract

Gynecologic oncologists have an essential role to treat women with gynecological cancer. It has been demonstrated that specialized physicians who work in multidisciplinary teams to treat women with gynecological cancers are able to obtain the best clinical and oncological outcomes. However, the access to gynecologic oncologists for women with suspected gynecological cancer is scarce. Therefore, this review analyzes the importance of specialized care of women with ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancer. In addition, the role of gynecologic oncologists who offer fertility-sparing treatment as well as their role in assisting general gynecologists and obstetricians is also reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,316,578
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#220
of 22,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,751
of 402,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#4
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,472 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.