↓ Skip to main content

Monitoring of Hadrontherapy Treatments by Means of Charged Particle Detection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monitoring of Hadrontherapy Treatments by Means of Charged Particle Detection
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2016.00177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Muraro, Giuseppe Battistoni, Francesco Collamati, Erika De Lucia, Riccardo Faccini, Fernando Ferroni, Salvatore Fiore, Paola Frallicciardi, Michela Marafini, Ilaria Mattei, Silvio Morganti, Riccardo Paramatti, Luca Piersanti, Davide Pinci, Antoni Rucinski, Andrea Russomando, Alessio Sarti, Adalberto Sciubba, Elena Solfaroli-Camillocci, Marco Toppi, Giacomo Traini, Cecilia Voena, Vincenzo Patera

Abstract

The interaction of the incoming beam radiation with the patient body in hadrontherapy treatments produces secondary charged and neutral particles, whose detection can be used for monitoring purposes and to perform an on-line check of beam particle range. In the context of ion-therapy with active scanning, charged particles are potentially attractive since they can be easily tracked with a high efficiency, in presence of a relatively low background contamination. In order to verify the possibility of exploiting this approach for in-beam monitoring in ion-therapy, and to guide the design of specific detectors, both simulations and experimental tests are being performed with ion beams impinging on simple homogeneous tissue-like targets (PMMA). From these studies, a resolution of the order of few millimeters on the single track has been proven to be sufficient to exploit charged particle tracking for monitoring purposes, preserving the precision achievable on longitudinal shape. The results obtained so far show that the measurement of charged particles can be successfully implemented in a technology capable of monitoring both the dose profile and the position of the Bragg peak inside the target and finally lead to the design of a novel profile detector. Crucial aspects to be considered are the detector positioning, to be optimized in order to maximize the available statistics, and the capability of accounting for the multiple scattering interactions undergone by the charged fragments along their exit path from the patient body. The experimental results collected up to now are also valuable for the validation of Monte Carlo simulation software tools and their implementation in Treatment Planning Software packages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 20 44%
Energy 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#16,129,310
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,557
of 22,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,880
of 382,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#20
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.