↓ Skip to main content

Combination Approaches with Immune-Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
7 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combination Approaches with Immune-Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer Therapy
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2016.00233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maarten Swart, Inge Verbrugge, Joost B. Beltman

Abstract

In healthy individuals, immune-checkpoint molecules prevent autoimmune responses and limit immune cell-mediated tissue damage. Tumors frequently exploit these molecules to evade eradication by the immune system. Over the past years, immune-checkpoint blockade of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and programed death-1 emerged as promising strategies to activate antitumor cytotoxic T cell responses. Although complete regression and long-term survival is achieved in some patients, not all patients respond. This review describes promising, novel combination approaches involving immune-checkpoint blockade in the context of the cancer-immunity cycle, aimed at increasing response rates to the single treatments. Specifically, we discuss combinations that promote antigen release and presentation, that further amplify T cell activation, that inhibit trafficking of regulatory T cells or MSDCs, that stimulate intratumoral T cell infiltration, that increase cancer recognition by T cells, and that stimulate tumor killing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 209 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Student > Master 28 13%
Other 15 7%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 27 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 39 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,573,688
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#611
of 22,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,584
of 318,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#5
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,741 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.