↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Complementary Therapies in the Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of Complementary Therapies in the Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Survivors
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2017.00326
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sahar Zaidi, Showket Hussain, Shalini Verma, Zubia Veqar, Asiya Khan, Sheeraz Un Nazir, Neha Singh, Jamal Ali Moiz, Pranay Tanwar, Anurag Srivastava, G. K. Rath, Ravi Mehrotra

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer diagnosed in women and the second most common cancer overall, ranking as the fifth cause of death from cancer. The chronicity of the disease produces long-term physiological and psychological manifestations, which adversely affect the quality of life of the individual. The primary treatment while managing cancer presents with various debilitating side effects. With the recent advances in treatment techniques that have improved the survival rate, patients suffer from continuing posttreatment complications. Patients seem to cope well with the stress of treatment of BC and sustain a normal life; however, the deterioration in physical well-being makes the patient functionally inefficient. Exercise has been proven to be an effective, safe, and feasible tool in combating the adverse effects of treatment, prevents complications and decreases the risk of BC-specific mortality. This review briefly presents an overview of the burden of the disease and its management strategies. Owing to the heterogeneity of the population and the multitude of therapies they receive, the response of each patient to treatment is different and so is the magnitude of adverse effects. The review discusses the late sequelae following treatment and evidence supporting the role of physical activity in their management. In conclusion, there is a need for personalized physical activity plans to be developed to suit the individual and their circumstances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 149 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 43 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 32 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 16%
Sports and Recreations 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 53 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,719,376
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,199
of 22,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,627
of 450,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#16
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,428 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.