↓ Skip to main content

Estrogens and Their Receptors in Prostate Cancer: Therapeutic Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estrogens and Their Receptors in Prostate Cancer: Therapeutic Implications
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2018.00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erika Di Zazzo, Giovanni Galasso, Pia Giovannelli, Marzia Di Donato, Gabriella Castoria

Abstract

A major challenge in clinical management of prostate cancer (PC) is to limit tumor growth and prevent metastatic spreading. Considerable efforts have been made to discover new compounds for PC therapy and recent years have seen promising progress in this field. Pharmacological approaches have been designed to achieve benefits in PC treatment and avoid the negative side effects resulting from administration of antagonists or agonists or new drugs. Nonetheless, the currently available therapies frequently induce resistance and PC progresses toward castration-resistant forms that can be caused by the androgen receptor reactivation and/or mutations, or derangement of signaling pathways. Preclinical and clinical findings have also shown that other nuclear receptors are frequently altered in PC. In this review, we focus on the role of estradiol/estradiol receptor (ER) axis, which controls PC growth and progression. Selective targeting of ER subtypes (α or β) may be an attractive way to limit the growth and spreading of prostatic cancer cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 30 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,208,166
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,461
of 22,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,877
of 451,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#18
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,428 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.