↓ Skip to main content

Attenuated Bacteria as Immunotherapeutic Tools for Cancer Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 22,778)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
202 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attenuated Bacteria as Immunotherapeutic Tools for Cancer Treatment
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2018.00136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suneesh Kaimala, Ashraf Al-Sbiei, Otavio Cabral-Marques, Maria J. Fernandez-Cabezudo, Basel K. Al-Ramadi

Abstract

The use of attenuated bacteria as cancer therapeutic tools has garnered increasing scientific interest over the past 10 years. This is largely due to the development of bacterial strains that maintain good anti-tumor efficacy, but with reduced potential to cause toxicities to the host. Because of its ability to replicate in viable as well as necrotic tissue, cancer therapy using attenuated strains of facultative anaerobic bacteria, such as Salmonella, has several advantages over standard treatment modalities, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Despite some findings suggesting that it may operate through a direct cytotoxic effect against cancer cells, there is accumulating evidence demonstrating that bacterial therapy acts by modulating cells of the immune system to counter the growth of the tumor. Herein, we review the experimental evidence underlying the success of bacterial immunotherapy against cancer and highlight the cellular and molecular alterations in the peripheral immune system and within the tumor microenvironment that have been reported following different forms of bacterial therapy. Our improved understanding of these mechanisms should greatly aid in the translational application of bacterial therapy to cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 202 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 21%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Chemical Engineering 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 30 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#274,244
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#44
of 22,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,096
of 340,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#2
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,778 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.