↓ Skip to main content

The Complex Puzzle of Interactions Among Functional Food, Gut Microbiota, and Colorectal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Complex Puzzle of Interactions Among Functional Food, Gut Microbiota, and Colorectal Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2018.00325
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lígia A. B. M. Mendonça, Rosângela dos Santos Ferreira, Rita de Cássia Avellaneda Guimarães, Alinne P. de Castro, Octávio L. Franco, Rosemary Matias, Cristiano M. E. Carvalho

Abstract

Colorectal cancer exerts a strong influence on the epidemiological panorama worldwide, and it is directly correlated to etiologic factors that are substantiated by genetic and environmental elements. This complex mixture of factors also has a relationship involving the structural dependence and composition of the gut microbiome, leading to a dysbacteriosis process that may evolve to serious modifications in the intestinal lining, eventually causing the development of a neoplasm. The gastrointestinal tract presents defense strategies and immunological properties that interfere in intestinal permeability, inhibiting the bacterial translocation, thus maintaining the integrity of intestinal homeostasis. The modulation of the intestinal microbiome and the extinction of risk factors associated with intestinal balance losses, especially of environmental factors, make cell and defense alterations impossible. This modulation may be conducted by means of functional foods in the diet, especially soluble fibers, polyunsaturated fatty acids, antioxidants and prebiotics that signal immunomodulatory effects in the intestinal microbiota, with preventive and therapeutic action for colorectal cancer. In summary, this review focuses on the importance of dietary modulation of the intestinal microbiota as an instrument for dysbacteriosis and, consequently, for the prevention of colorectal cancer, suggesting anticarcinogenic, and antiangiogenic properties. Among the intestinal modulating agents considered here are functional foods, especially flaxseed, oat and soy, composing a Bioactive Food Compound.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 27 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 29 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,043,000
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#9,375
of 22,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,397
of 345,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#111
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,603 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.