↓ Skip to main content

Osmolyte Induced Tumorigenesis and Metastasis: Interactions With Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Osmolyte Induced Tumorigenesis and Metastasis: Interactions With Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2018.00353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franklin D. Rumjanek

Abstract

In spite of a great deal of work, the biochemical mechanisms underlying tumorigenesis and metastasis are not yet fully understood. Specifically regarding metastasis many authors consider that malignancy is caused by the accumulation of mutations. However, evidence is gathering to show that tumors are composed of heterogeneous cell populations subjected to selective pressures. In this micro evolutionary scenario, intra- and extra-cellular selective pressures will determine which subpopulations of tumor cells will thrive and be able to dissociate from the tumor as autonomous metastatic cells. We propose here that alteration of conformations of transcription factors confer novel non-canonical functions that may induce oncogenesis and metastasis in a mutation independent manner. We argue that the functional plasticity of transcription factors is due to intrinsically disordered domains (IDRs) of proteins. IDRs prevent spontaneous folding of proteins into well-defined three-dimensional structures. Because most transcription factors contain IDRs, each could potentially interact with many ligands. This high degree of functional pleiotropy would then be ultimately responsible for the metastatic phenotype. The conformations of proteins can be altered by chemical chaperones collectively known as osmolytes. Osmolytes are small organic molecules permeable through biological membranes that can accumulate in cells, increase the thermodynamic stability of proteins, modulate enzyme activity and prevent protein aggregation. Thus, by modifying IDRs, osmolytes could subvert the homeostatic regulatory network of cells. Untargeted metabolomic analysis of oral cancer cells showed that those with the greatest metastatic potential contained several osmolytes that were absent in the non-metastatic cells. We hypothesize that high concentrations of osmolytes might promote conformational alterations of transcription factors that favor metastatic behavior. This hypothesis is eminently testable by investigating whether: (a) the intracellular microenvironment of metastatic cells differs from non-metastatic cells and whether osmolytes are responsible for this change and (b) high intracellular concentrations of osmolytes are sufficient to induce structural modifications in regulatory protein so as to establish novel interactive networks that will constitute the metastatic phenotype. Synthetic cell penetrating peptides mimicking IDRs could act as sensitive probes. By exposing the peptides to the microenvironments of living tumor and metastatic tumor cells one should be able to compare the chemical shifts as revealed by spectra obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,320
of 22,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,697
of 344,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#121
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,432 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.