↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic Genes of Breast Cancer Identified by Gene Co-expression Network Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic Genes of Breast Cancer Identified by Gene Co-expression Network Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2018.00374
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianing Tang, Deguang Kong, Qiuxia Cui, Kun Wang, Dan Zhang, Yan Gong, Gaosong Wu

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies. The molecular mechanisms of its pathogenesis are still to be investigated. The aim of this study was to identify the potential genes associated with the progression of breast cancer. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to construct free-scale gene co-expression networks to explore the associations between gene sets and clinical features, and to identify candidate biomarkers. The gene expression profiles of GSE1561 were selected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. RNA-seq data and clinical information of breast cancer from TCGA were used for validation. A total of 18 modules were identified via the average linkage hierarchical clustering. In the significant module (R2 = 0.48), 42 network hub genes were identified. Based on the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data, 5 hub genes (CCNB2, FBXO5, KIF4A, MCM10, and TPX2) were correlated with poor prognosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve validated that the mRNA levels of these 5 genes exhibited excellent diagnostic efficiency for normal and tumor tissues. In addition, the protein levels of these 5 genes were also significantly higher in tumor tissues compared with normal tissues. Among them, CCNB2, KIF4A, and TPX2 were further upregulated in advanced tumor stage. In conclusion, 5 candidate biomarkers were identified for further basic and clinical research on breast cancer with co-expression network analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 10 10%
Other 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 40 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Computer Science 6 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 47 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,755,951
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,393
of 22,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,052
of 348,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#118
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,603 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.