↓ Skip to main content

Neoadjuvant vs. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC): Analysis From the RISC Database

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neoadjuvant vs. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC): Analysis From the RISC Database
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, November 2018
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2018.00463
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriella Del Bene, Fabio Calabrò, Diana Giannarelli, Elizabeth R. Plimack, Lauren C. Harshman, Evan Y. Yu, Simon J. Crabb, Sumanta Kumar Pal, Ajjai S. Alva, Thomas Powles, Ugo De Giorgi, Neeraj Agarwal, Aristotelis Bamias, Sylvain Ladoire, Andrea Necchi, Ulka N. Vaishampayan, Günter Niegisch, Joaquim Bellmunt, Jack Baniel, Matthew D. Galsky, Cora N. Sternberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 11 25%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,189,947
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,780
of 22,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,107
of 446,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#29
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,544 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.