↓ Skip to main content

The Profile of Immunophenotype and Genotype Aberrations in Subsets of Pediatric T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Profile of Immunophenotype and Genotype Aberrations in Subsets of Pediatric T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2019.00316
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elda Pereira Noronha, Luísa Vieira Codeço Marques, Francianne Gomes Andrade, Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler, Eugênia Terra-Granado, Maria S. Pombo-de-Oliveira, Brazilian Collaborative Study Group of Acute Leukemia, Carolina da Paz Zampier, Thayana da Conceição Barbosa, Paulo Chagas Neto, Gisele Dallapicola Brisson, Filipe Vicente dos Santos Bueno, Ingrid Cezar Sardou, Bruno Gonçalves Aguiar, Anna Carolina Silva Dias, Patrícia Carneiro de Brito, Geraldo Pedral Sampaio, Raimundo Antônio Gomes Oliveira, Claudia Teresa de Oliveira, César Casagranda, Geni Ramos Vera, Gustavo Ribeiro Neves, Isis Maria Quezado Magalhães, José Carlos Córdoba, Juliana Teixeira Costa, Rebeca Ferreira Marques, Renata Pereira de Souza Barros, Renata Sarkis Alves, Renato Guedes, Sidnei Epelman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 23 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 29 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#21,214,790
of 26,051,341 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,607
of 22,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,423
of 366,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#188
of 307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,051,341 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,876 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.