↓ Skip to main content

Organ Preservation and Late Functional Outcome in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: Rationale of EORTC 1420, the “Best of” Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Organ Preservation and Late Functional Outcome in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: Rationale of EORTC 1420, the “Best of” Trial
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2019.00999
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Jacques Stelmes, Vincent Gregoire, Vincent Vander Poorten, Wojciech Golusiñski, Mateusz Szewczyk, Terry Jones, Mohssen Ansarin, Martina A. Broglie, Roland Giger, Jens Peter Klussmann, Mererid Evans, Jean Bourhis, C. René Leemans, Giuseppe Spriano, Andreas Dietz, Keith Hunter, Frank Zimmermann, Ingeborg Tinhofer, Joanne M. Patterson, Silvana Quaglini, Anne-Sophie Govaerts, Catherine Fortpied, Christian Simon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 23%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,254,606
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,428
of 22,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,295
of 374,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#38
of 491 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,812 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 491 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.