You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Latin American Study of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer LACAM: A Genomic Epidemiology Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2019.01429 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Javier Oliver, Rosalía Quezada Urban, Claudia Alejandra Franco Cortés, Clara Estela Díaz Velásquez, Ana Lorena Montealegre Paez, Rafael Adrián Pacheco-Orozco, Carlos Castro Rojas, Reggie García-Robles, Juan Javier López Rivera, Sandra Gaitán Chaparro, Ana Milena Gómez, Fernando Suarez Obando, Gustavo Giraldo, Maria Isabel Maya, Paula Hurtado-Villa, Ana Isabel Sanchez, Norma Serrano, Ana Isabel Orduz Galvis, Sandra Aruachan, Johanna Nuñez Castillo, Cecilia Frecha, Cecilia Riggi, Federico Jauk, Eva María Gómez García, Claudia Lorena Carranza, Vanessa Zamora, Gabriela Torres Mejía, Isabelle Romieu, Carlos Arturo Castañeda, Miluska Castillo, Rina Gitler, Adriana Antoniano, Ernesto Rojas Jiménez, Luis Enrique Romero Cruz, Fernando Vallejo Lecuona, Iván Delgado Enciso, Abril Bernardette Martínez Rizo, Alejandro Flores Carranza, Verónica Benites Godinez, Claudia Fabiola Méndez Catalá, Luis Alonso Herrera, Yolanda Irasema Chirino, Luis Ignacio Terrazas, Sandra Perdomo, Felipe Vaca Paniagua |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 12 | 60% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 49 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,521,922
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#591
of 22,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,992
of 475,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#22
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.