You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Generalization vs. Specificity: In Which Cases Should a Clinic Train its Own Segmentation Models?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2020.00675 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Schreier, Francesca Attanasi, Hannu Laaksonen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2020.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,033
of 22,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,550
of 421,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#182
of 472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.