↓ Skip to main content

Planning With Patient-Specific Rectal Sub-Region Constraints Decreases Probability of Toxicity in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Planning With Patient-Specific Rectal Sub-Region Constraints Decreases Probability of Toxicity in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2020.01597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Lafond, Anaïs Barateau, Joël N'Guessan, Nicolas Perichon, Nolwenn Delaby, Antoine Simon, Pascal Haigron, Eugenia Mylona, Oscar Acosta, Renaud de Crevoisier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2020.
All research outputs
#17,362,412
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,078
of 22,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,139
of 426,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#232
of 637 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,568 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 637 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.