You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Problems and Promises of Introducing the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linear Accelerator Into Routine Care: The Case of Prostate Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2020.01741 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charisma Hehakaya, Jochem R. Van der Voort van Zyp, Jan J. W. Lagendijk, Diederick E. Grobbee, Helena M. Verkooijen, Ellen H. M. Moors |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 33% |
| Jordan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 40 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,957,394
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,295
of 22,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,539
of 426,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#84
of 614 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,741 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 614 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.