You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Definitive Simultaneous Integrated Boost Versus Conventional-Fractionated Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.618776 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chen Li, Lijun Tan, Xiao Liu, Xin Wang, Zongmei Zhou, Dongfu Chen, Qinfu Feng, Jun Liang, Jima Lv, Xiaozhen Wang, Nan Bi, Lei Deng, Wenqing Wang, Tao Zhang, Wenjie Ni, Xiao Chang, Weiming Han, Zefen Xiao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 60% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
| Design | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#20,167,676
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#9,451
of 22,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,982
of 458,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#527
of 1,456 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,456 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.