You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Pragmatic Non-Randomized Trial of Prehabilitation Prior to Cancer Surgery: Study Protocol and COVID-19-Related Adaptations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.629207 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Santa Mina, Daniel Sellers, Darren Au, Shabbir M. H. Alibhai, Hance Clarke, Brian H. Cuthbertson, Gail Darling, Alaa El Danab, Anand Govindarajan, Karim Ladha, Andrew G. Matthew, Stuart McCluskey, Karen A. Ng, Fayez Quereshy, Keyvan Karkouti, Ian M. Randall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 206 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Researcher | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 20% |
| Unknown | 89 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 95 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,734,944
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,619
of 22,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,996
of 452,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#337
of 998 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 998 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.