You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CyberKnife for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.652646 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucio De Maria, Lodovico Terzi di Bergamo, Alfredo Conti, Kazuhiko Hayashi, Valentina Pinzi, Taro Murai, Rachelle Lanciano, Sigita Burneikiene, Michela Buglione di Monale, Stefano Maria Magrini, Marco Maria Fontanella |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 43% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 20 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,813,000
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,739
of 22,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,043
of 455,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#167
of 1,113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.