You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Multiple Clinical Testing Modalities for Assessment of NPM1-Mutant AML
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.701318 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda Lopez, Sanjay Patel, Julia T. Geyer, Joelle Racchumi, Amy Chadburn, Paul Simonson, Madhu M. Ouseph, Giorgio Inghirami, Nuria Mencia-Trinchant, Monica L. Guzman, Alexandra Gomez-Arteaga, Sangmin Lee, Pinkal Desai, Ellen K. Ritchie, Gail J. Roboz, Wayne Tam, Michael J. Kluk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 42% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,199,739
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,782
of 22,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,793
of 434,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#91
of 1,366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.