↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the Relative Diagnostic Performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for the Detection of Bone Metastasis in Patients With Different Cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the Relative Diagnostic Performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for the Detection of Bone Metastasis in Patients With Different Cancers
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.737827
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junhao Wu, Yingwei Wang, Taiping Liao, Zijuan Rao, Weidong Gong, Lei Ou, Yue Chen, Chunyin Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 35%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2021.
All research outputs
#16,795,718
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,658
of 22,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,314
of 436,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#358
of 1,403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,568 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.