You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of Recessively Inherited Genetic Variants Potentially Linked to Pancreatic Cancer Risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.771312 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ye Lu, Manuel Gentiluomo, Angelica Macauda, Domenica Gioffreda, Maria Gazouli, Maria C. Petrone, Dezső Kelemen, Laura Ginocchi, Luca Morelli, Konstantinos Papiris, William Greenhalf, Jakob R. Izbicki, Vytautas Kiudelis, Beatrice Mohelníková-Duchoňová, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Pavel Vodicka, Hermann Brenner, Markus K. Diener, Raffaele Pezzilli, Audrius Ivanauskas, Roberto Salvia, Andrea Szentesi, Mateus Nóbrega Aoki, Balázs C. Németh, Cosimo Sperti, Krzysztof Jamroziak, Roger Chammas, Martin Oliverius, Livia Archibugi, Stefano Ermini, János Novák, Juozas Kupcinskas, Ondřej Strouhal, Pavel Souček, Giulia M. Cavestro, Anna C. Milanetto, Giuseppe Vanella, John P. Neoptolemos, George E. Theodoropoulos, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven, Andrea Mambrini, Stefania Moz, Zdenek Kala, Martin Loveček, Daniela Basso, Faik G. Uzunoglu, Thilo Hackert, Sabrina G. G. Testoni, Viktor Hlaváč, Angelo Andriulli, Maurizio Lucchesi, Francesca Tavano, Silvia Carrara, Péter Hegyi, Paolo G. Arcidiacono, Olivier R. Busch, Rita T. Lawlor, Marta Puzzono, Ugo Boggi, Feng Guo, Ewa Małecka-Panas, Gabriele Capurso, Stefano Landi, Renata Talar-Wojnarowska, Oliver Strobel, Xin Gao, Yogesh Vashist, Daniele Campa, Federico Canzian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Greece | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 33% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2021.
All research outputs
#14,917,787
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#3,957
of 22,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,087
of 519,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#197
of 1,368 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,820 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,368 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.