↓ Skip to main content

The value of dual-energy spectral CT in differentiating solitary pulmonary tuberculosis and solitary lung adenocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The value of dual-energy spectral CT in differentiating solitary pulmonary tuberculosis and solitary lung adenocarcinoma
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2022.1000028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guojin Zhang, Shenglin Li, Ke Yang, Lan Shang, Feng Zhang, Zixin Huang, Jialiang Ren, Zhuoli Zhang, Junlin Zhou, Hong Pu, Qiong Man, Weifang Kong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#21,064,103
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,551
of 22,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#363,737
of 492,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#974
of 1,505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,820 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.