↓ Skip to main content

Genetic testing and prognosis of sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic testing and prognosis of sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma patients
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2022.1086908
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bin Jia, Peiyi Xia, Junqiang Dong, Wenhao Feng, Wenjia Wang, Enjie Liu, Guozhong Jiang, Yanru Qin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,092,147
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,666
of 22,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,941
of 472,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#360
of 1,402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,507 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.