You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A new intronic quantitative PCR method led to the discovery of transformation from human ascites to murine malignancy in a mouse model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2023.1062424 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiankang Jin, Longfei Huo, Yibo Fan, Ruiping Wang, Ailing W. Scott, Melissa Pool Pizzi, Xiaodan Yao, Shan Shao, Lang Ma, Matheus S. Da Silva, Kohei Yamashita, Katsuhiro Yoshimura, Boyu Zhang, Jingjing Wu, Linghua Wang, Shumei Song, Jaffer A. Ajani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#21,038,338
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,540
of 22,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,906
of 479,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#750
of 1,403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,812 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.