↓ Skip to main content

Adjuvant capecitabine in triple negative breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment: real-world evidence from CaRe, a multicentric, observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjuvant capecitabine in triple negative breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment: real-world evidence from CaRe, a multicentric, observational study
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, May 2023
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1152123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Sofia Di Lisa, Eriseld Krasniqi, Laura Pizzuti, Maddalena Barba, Katia Cannita, Ugo De Giorgi, Fulvio Borella, Jennifer Foglietta, Anna Cariello, Antonella Ferro, Elisa Picardo, Marco Mitidieri, Valentina Sini, Simonetta Stani, Giuseppe Tonini, Daniele Santini, Nicla La Verde, Anna Rita Gambaro, Antonino Grassadonia, Nicola Tinari, Ornella Garrone, Giuseppina Sarobba, Lorenzo Livi, Icro Meattini, Giuliana D’Auria, Matteo Vergati, Teresa Gamucci, Mirco Pistelli, Rossana Berardi, Emanuela Risi, Francesco Giotta, Vito Lorusso, Lucia Rinaldi, Salvatore Artale, Marina Elena Cazzaniga, Fable Zustovich, Federico Cappuzzo, Lorenza Landi, Rosalba Torrisi, Simone Scagnoli, Andrea Botticelli, Andrea Michelotti, Beatrice Fratini, Rosa Saltarelli, Ida Paris, Margherita Muratore, Alessandra Cassano, Lorenzo Gianni, Valeria Gaspari, Enzo Maria Veltri, Federica Zoratto, Elena Fiorio, Maria Agnese Fabbri, Marco Mazzotta, Enzo Maria Ruggeri, Rebecca Pedersini, Maria Rosaria Valerio, Lorena Filomeno, Mauro Minelli, Paola Scavina, Mimma Raffaele, Antonio Astone, Roy De Vita, Marcello Pozzi, Ferdinando Riccardi, Filippo Greco, Luca Moscetti, Monica Giordano, Marcello Maugeri-Saccà, Alessandro Zennaro, Claudio Botti, Fabio Pelle, Sonia Cappelli, Flavia Cavicchi, Enrico Vizza, Giuseppe Sanguineti, Federica Tomao, Enrico Cortesi, Paolo Marchetti, Silverio Tomao, Iolanda Speranza, Isabella Sperduti, Gennaro Ciliberto, Patrizia Vici

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,199,734
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#858
of 22,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,243
of 398,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#32
of 1,143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,829 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.