↓ Skip to main content

Young patients show poor efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitor combined therapy in metastatic gastrointestinal cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Young patients show poor efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitor combined therapy in metastatic gastrointestinal cancers
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, May 2023
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1155019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yingnan Wang, Shasha Zhang, Fengbin Zhang, Lei Wang, Chensi Wu, Xiaoyun Zhang, Ruixing Zhang, Zhanjun Guo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,041
of 22,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,413
of 406,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#352
of 1,162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.