↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of a combined hypoxia- and metabolism-related prognostic signature to predict clinical prognosis and immunotherapy responses in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of a combined hypoxia- and metabolism-related prognostic signature to predict clinical prognosis and immunotherapy responses in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, November 2023
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1162846
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Wu, Wenjie Xie, Binbin Gong, Bin Fu, Weimin Chen, Libo Zhou, Lianmin Luo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#23,065,269
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#16,238
of 22,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,503
of 360,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#801
of 882 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,767 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 882 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.