You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison between regular additional endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma under systemic chemotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2023.1227036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Möhring, Oliver Khan, Taotao Zhou, Farsaneh Sadeghlar, Robert Mahn, Dominik J. Kaczmarek, Leona Dold, Marieta Toma, Milka Marinova, Tim R. Glowka, Hanno Matthaei, Steffen Manekeller, Jörg C. Kalff, Christian P. Strassburg, Tobias J. Weismüller, Maria A. Gonzalez-Carmona |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,737,737
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,626
of 22,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,248
of 353,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#200
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.