You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of predictive factors of unforeseen nodal metastases in resected clinical stage I NSCLC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2023.1229939 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Filippo Tommaso Gallina, Daniele Marinelli, Riccardo Tajè, Daniele Forcella, Gabriele Alessandrini, Fabiana Letizia Cecere, Francesca Fusco, Paolo Visca, Isabella Sperduti, Vincenzo Ambrogi, Federico Cappuzzo, Enrico Melis, Francesco Facciolo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,003,628
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#4,124
of 22,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,157
of 364,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#92
of 892 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,767 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 892 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.