↓ Skip to main content

Cranial radiation therapy with hippocampus avoidance in lung cancer treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cranial radiation therapy with hippocampus avoidance in lung cancer treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1268754
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yue Zheng, Liting You, Baijie Feng, Min Tang, Feifei Na

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,063,069
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,651
of 22,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,780
of 356,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#146
of 924 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 924 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.