You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pharyngeal reconstruction after total laryngectomy with sliding epiglottis: technical aspects with retrospective review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2023.1284266 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aleš Grošelj, Ivana Tancer, Anže Jerman, Jošt Paučič, Luka Pušnik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#22,794,714
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#15,956
of 22,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,272
of 332,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#674
of 782 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 782 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.