↓ Skip to main content

Rare case report: a case of histological type transformation of lung cancer caused by neoadjuvant immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rare case report: a case of histological type transformation of lung cancer caused by neoadjuvant immunotherapy
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1329152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quanqing Li, Guangxin Zhang, Hao Yang, Jindong Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,613,405
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,472
of 22,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,909
of 232,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#90
of 609 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,496 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 609 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.