↓ Skip to main content

A review on the impact of single-stranded library preparation on plasma cell-free diversity for cancer detection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review on the impact of single-stranded library preparation on plasma cell-free diversity for cancer detection
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1332004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordan C. Cheng, Neeti Swarup, David T. W. Wong, David Chia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,433,619
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,102
of 22,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,578
of 229,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#121
of 632 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,703 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 632 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.