↓ Skip to main content

A bibliometric analysis of HER2-positive breast cancer: 1987–2024

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A bibliometric analysis of HER2-positive breast cancer: 1987–2024
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1355353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sherlissa Ali-Thompson, Gordon R. Daly, Gavin P. Dowling, Conor Kilkenny, Luke Cox, Jason McGrath, Ma’en M. AlRawashdeh, Sindhuja Naidoo, Colm Power, Arnold D. K. Hill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,981,843
of 26,058,621 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,034
of 22,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,253
of 260,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#46
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,058,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,876 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.