↓ Skip to main content

TNF-α is a predictive marker in distinguishing myeloproliferative neoplasm and idiopathic erythrocytosis/thrombocytosis: development and validation of a non-invasive diagnostic model

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TNF-α is a predictive marker in distinguishing myeloproliferative neoplasm and idiopathic erythrocytosis/thrombocytosis: development and validation of a non-invasive diagnostic model
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1369346
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenhao Wang, Yu Mei, Zhuming Yang, Qiang Gao, Hao Xu, Zhiqiang Han, Zhenya Hong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,983,439
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,533
of 22,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,716
of 269,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#221
of 566 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,796 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 566 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.