You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long-term survival, toxicities, and the role of chrono-chemotherapy with different infusion rates in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a retrospective study with a 5-year follow-up
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2024.1371878 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lina Liu, Xunyan Luo, Weili Wu, Yuanyuan Li, Jinhua Long, Xiuling Luo, Xiaoxiao Chen, Xiuyun Gong, Chaofen Zhao, Qianyong He, Zhuoling Li, Kai Shang, Yue Chen, Xu Xinyu, Feng Jin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,320,284
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#9,506
of 22,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,032
of 302,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#164
of 581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,812 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.