↓ Skip to main content

GLP-1 receptor agonist as an effective treatment for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GLP-1 receptor agonist as an effective treatment for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a case report
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1392375
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fionnuala Crowley, Stav Brown, Emily J. Gallagher, Joseph H. Dayan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,649,940
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,191
of 22,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,923
of 223,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#76
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,820 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.